CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 18:60
UNAUTHORIZED DISPENSING OF A SCHEDULE III, IV, OR V CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE
The elements of the crime of unauthorized dispensing of a schedule
III, IV, or V controlled substance are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. dispensed any schedule III, IV, or V controlled substance,
4. other than from a pharmacy pursuant to a written, oral,
mechanically produced, computer generated, electronically
transmitted, or facsimile transmitted order or as a practitioner
in the course of his [her] professional practice.
[5. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of unauthorized dispensing of a schedule III, IV, or V
controlled substance.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of unauthorized dispensing of a
schedule III, IV, or V controlled substance.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
e40442c979afc4837447bca20811b2f416f4a47b03c586bc3120d7719fec3da6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.