CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 18:54
PURCHASE OF AN EXCESS AMOUNT OF METHAMPHETAMINE PRECURSOR DRUGS WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS
The elements of the crime purchase of an excess amount
methamphetamine precursor drugs within twenty-four hours are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. purchased more than three and six-tenths grams of a
methamphetamine precursor drug or a combination of two or
more methamphetamine precursor drugs,
5. during any twenty-four-hour period.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of retail sale of purchase of an excess amount
methamphetamine precursor drugs within twenty-four hours.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of purchase of an excess amount
methamphetamine precursor drugs within twenty-four hours.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
9627881783e18e9c4b712c85723b7f082464dfb0dd0c3429498aad718605b0bd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.