CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 18:37
UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO OR BY THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA REGISTRY
The elements of the crime of unauthorized release of confidential
information provided to or by the marijuana registry are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. released or made public,
4. any confidential record or any confidential information
contained in any such record that was provided to or by the
marijuana registry or primary caregiver registry of the
Department of Public Health and Environment,
5. without the written authorization of the marijuana registry
patient.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of unauthorized release of confidential information
provided to or by the marijuana registry.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of unauthorized release of
confidential information provided to or by the marijuana registry.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
ae22bdbe6f1ae389d7ada52daf0abe546c4c661889cc63144670fc6bba4b3873
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.