CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 18:34
FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION OF A MEDICAL CONDITION RELATED TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA
The elements of the crime of fraudulent representation of a medical
condition related to medical marijuana are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. fraudulently,
4. represented a medical condition to a physician, the Department
of Public Health and Environment, or a state or local law
enforcement official,
5. for the purpose of falsely obtaining a marijuana registry
identification card from the Department of Public Health and
Environment, or for the purpose of avoiding arrest and
prosecution for a marijuana-related offense.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of fraudulent representation of a medical condition
related to medical marijuana.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of fraudulent representation of a
medical condition related to medical marijuana.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
90cb8dda822ef726babc08f843ed23f41d76485e4bae824bb3323f8a3c9f2fc6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.