CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 13:29
FAILURE TO POST NOTICE
The elements of the crime of failure to post notice are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
[3. was a secondhand dealer, and
4. failed to conspicuously post a notice in a place clearly visible to
all buyers and traders,
5. which set forth the following information: [insert statement of
information required by section 18-13-115(1)].]
[3. was an operator of a flea market or similar facility, and
4. failed to post notice containing the following information:
[insert statement of information required by section 18-13-
115(1)],
5. in such a manner as to be obvious to all persons who entered
the flea market or similar facility.]
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of failure to post notice.
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of failure to post notice.
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
a4aebe21aad36abb40b1851e5c99ff538fb2072a8400bf60e9338e74d66a2956
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.