CO · jury_instructions
COLJI-Crim. 12-1:46.4
UNLAWFUL STORAGE OF A FIREARM IN A VEHICLE (LEAVING FIREARM UNATTENDED)
The elements of the crime of unlawful storage of a firearm in a
vehicle (leaving firearm unattended) are:
1. That the defendant,
2. in the State of Colorado, at or about the date and place charged,
3. knowingly,
4. left a firearm that was not a handgun in an unattended vehicle,
and
5. the firearm was not in a locked hard-sided container or locked
soft-sided container that was in a locked vehicle, the locked
trunk of a locked vehicle, or a locked recreational vehicle.
[6. and that the defendant’s conduct was not legally authorized by
the affirmative defense[s] in Instruction[s] ___.]
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
proven each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find
the defendant guilty of unlawful storage of a firearm in a vehicle (leaving
firearm unattended).
After considering all the evidence, if you decide the prosecution has
failed to prove any one or more of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
you should find the defendant not guilty of unlawful storage of a firearm
in a vehicle (leaving firearm unattended).
History
COLJI-Crim. (2025), Colorado Supreme Court Model Criminal Jury Instructions Committee. The committee's page: "The 2025 edition was published online on February 25, 2026." © 2025 Supreme Court of Colorado for the State of Colorado.
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- crim-2026-02-25
- Content hash
05119e0d9fded7853549bee3cca3ab39b06d67ccf02336950f22330e1a79fa88
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.