Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 9:14

Negligence Per Se — Violation of Statute or Ordinance

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

At the time of the occurrence in question in this case, the following (statute[s])

(ordinance[s]) of the [name of municipal corporation], State of Colorado (was) (were) in

effect:

(Insert quotation of applicable statute[s] or ordinance[s]).

A violation of (this) (these) (statute[s]) (ordinance[s]) constitutes negligence.

If you find such a violation, you may only consider it if you also find that it was a

cause of the claimed (injuries) (damages) (losses).

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
a52cb4551b474e93a9f0066ea7ac1bba9a5ae7e2dbc022f36d4d3d66d7f823d0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CJI-Civ. 9:14 — Negligence Per Se — Violation of Stat… · binding.law