CJI-Civ. 32:4

For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable

pronoun) claim of civil theft, you must find that all of the following have been proved by a

preponderance of the evidence:

1. The plaintiff (owned) (possessed) (had an ownership interest in) the (insert thing of

value);

2. The defendant knowingly (without authorization) (by threat) (by deception)

(obtained) (retained) (exercised control over) the plaintiff’s (insert thing of value); and

3. The defendant did so with the intent to permanently deprive the plaintiff of the

use or benefit of the plaintiff’s (insert thing of value).

If you find that any one or more of these (number) statements have not been proved,

then your verdict must be for the defendant.

On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been

proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the

defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete

defense to plaintiff’s claim]).

If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative

defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be

for the defendant.

However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these

affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.