CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 31:4
Breach of Implied Contract Based on Violation of Employer’s Termination Policies or Procedures — Elements of Liability
For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable
pronoun) claim for breach of an employment contract, you must find that all of the
following have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence:
1. The defendant had a (insert description of appropriate document, e.g., “employee
handbook, personnel manual,” etc.) which was in effect at the time the plaintiff was
(constructively) discharged by the defendant;
2. The (employee handbook, personnel manual, etc.) set forth (policies) (and) (or)
(procedures) regarding the discharge of the defendant’s employees, such as the plaintiff;
3. The defendant demonstrated to such employees a willingness to be bound by such
(policies) (and) (or) (procedures);
4. The plaintiff was aware of the existence of the (employee handbook, personnel
manual, etc.) before (insert applicable pronoun) was discharged by the defendant;
5. The plaintiff reasonably understood that the defendant was offering the (employee
handbook, personnel manual, etc.) as part of the terms and conditions of (insert applicable
pronoun) employment, and, with that understanding, the plaintiff (began) (continued)
(insert applicable pronoun) employment with the defendant;
6. The defendant (constructively) discharged the plaintiff without complying with
the termination (policies) (procedures) set forth in its (employee handbook, personnel
manual, etc.); and
7. Until discharged, the plaintiff (substantially) performed (insert applicable
pronoun) part of the contract (or the plaintiff had some justification for nonperformance).
If you find that any of these (number) statements has not been proved, then your
verdict must be for the defendant.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been
proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the
defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete
defense to plaintiff’s claim]).
If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative
defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be
for the defendant.
However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these
affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
17f96a0b1eaef6df17605b90664042a2337af7d94441fec3786ca365a64b1f92
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.