CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 31:16
Affirmative Defense to Damages for Public-Policy Discharge Claim — After-Acquired Evidence of Fraud or Other Misconduct
If you find that the plaintiff, (name), had actual damages, then you must consider
whether the defendant, (name), has proved (insert applicable pronoun) affirmative defense of
after-acquired evidence of (fraud) (misconduct). The plaintiff cannot recover any damages
that occurred after the date that the defendant discovered evidence of (fraud) (misconduct)
by the plaintiff. This affirmative defense is proved if you find all of the following:
1. The plaintiff (describe type of misconduct, e.g., concealed or misrepresented a
material fact or facts on a resume with the intent of creating a false impression in the mind of the
defendant; committed theft; committed sexual harassment, etc.);
2. The defendant did not discover the (concealed or misrepresented fact or facts)
(misconduct) until after the plaintiff was discharged; and
3. A reasonable, objective employer (would not have hired) (would have discharged)
the plaintiff if it had discovered the (concealed or misrepresented fact or facts)
(misconduct) at the time of the plaintiff’s (fraud) (misconduct).
If you find that any one or more of these statements has not been proved, then you
shall make no deduction from the plaintiff’s damages.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these statements have been proved, then
you must not award the plaintiff any damages occurring after the date that the defendant
discovered evidence of the (fraud) (misconduct) by the plaintiff.
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
429dc5104239f105dc162ea4603164a228a90445f3abeeb9cfc20a6754a5e950
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.