Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 30:30

Contract Interpretation — Disputed Term

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

(Plaintiff) (Defendant) disputes the meaning of the following term contained in the

contract:

(insert text of the term)

(Plaintiff) (Defendant) claims that the term means (insert proposed interpretation of

the term). On the other hand, (plaintiff) (defendant) claims that the term means (insert

proposed interpretation of the term).

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
5d828313f666f6bc452fdfa4c7a7b87301c721d17f1d3d3d55bee216cec4b558
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.