CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 30:26
Defense — Statute of Limitations
The defendant, (name), is not legally responsible to the plaintiff, (name), on the
plaintiff’s claim of breach of contract if the affirmative defense of the expiration of the
statute of limitations is proved. This defense is proved if you find both of the following:
1. (Describe the events that constituted the claimed breach) occurred before (insert the
appropriate date); and
2. Plaintiff knew, or should have known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence, of
the existence of the (claimed) breach before (insert the appropriate date).
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
b0be2aa811a3ab24f1ec08de646d6e6ecc94a6cb8598276f5c6a48fbe44132bf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.