CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 30:18
Defense — Fraud in the Inducement
The defendant, (name), is not legally responsible to the plaintiff, (name), on the
plaintiff’s claim of breach of contract if the affirmative defense of fraud is proved. This
defense is proved if you find all of the following:
1. The plaintiff (concealed a past or present fact) (failed to disclose a past or present
fact that the plaintiff had a duty to disclose) (made a false representation of a past or
present fact);
2. The fact was material;
3. The defendant entered into the (claimed) contract relying on the assumption that
the ([concealed] [undisclosed] fact did not exist or was different from what it actually was)
(falsely stated fact was true);
4. The defendant’s reliance was justified;
5. The defendant’s reliance caused (insert applicable pronoun) (damages) (losses);
and
6. The defendant has returned or offered to return to plaintiff (describe what, if
anything, the defendant would be legally obligated to return to the plaintiff in order to prevent
the defendant from being unjustly enriched).
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
67d7404c1dc36cf9bc026bdba8ba16a8392ae5cc5f4d879691ae110d98b91468
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.