Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 24:1

Elements of Liability

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable

pronoun) claim of intentional interference with contract, you must find that all of the

following have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence:

1. The plaintiff had a contract with (name of third person) in which (name of third

person) agreed to (describe the substance of the promise the defendant allegedly interfered

with);

2. The defendant knew or reasonably should have known of the contract;

3. The defendant by words or conduct, or both, intentionally (caused [name of third

person] [not to perform] [to terminate] [insert applicable pronoun] contract with the

plaintiff) (or) (interfered with [name of third person]’s performance of the contract, thereby

causing [name of third person] [not to perform] [to terminate] the contract with the

plaintiff);

4. The defendant’s interference with the contract was improper; and

5. The defendant’s interference with the contract caused the plaintiff (damages)

(losses).

If you find any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved, then

your verdict must be for the defendant.

On the other hand, if you find that all of these statements have been proved, (then

your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the defendant’s affirmative

defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete defense to the plaintiff’s

claim]).

If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative

defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be

for the defendant.

(In determining whether the affirmative defense of privilege [describe privilege] has

been proved, you must also determine whether the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of

the evidence that the defendant abused that privilege as explained in Instruction No. [insert

instruction number that corresponds to 24:6].)

However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these

affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
97f3602adba0f14d044e530282aac169d752eec0f7332287a32aaf265d3297b6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.