CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 24:1
Elements of Liability
For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable
pronoun) claim of intentional interference with contract, you must find that all of the
following have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence:
1. The plaintiff had a contract with (name of third person) in which (name of third
person) agreed to (describe the substance of the promise the defendant allegedly interfered
with);
2. The defendant knew or reasonably should have known of the contract;
3. The defendant by words or conduct, or both, intentionally (caused [name of third
person] [not to perform] [to terminate] [insert applicable pronoun] contract with the
plaintiff) (or) (interfered with [name of third person]’s performance of the contract, thereby
causing [name of third person] [not to perform] [to terminate] the contract with the
plaintiff);
4. The defendant’s interference with the contract was improper; and
5. The defendant’s interference with the contract caused the plaintiff (damages)
(losses).
If you find any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved, then
your verdict must be for the defendant.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these statements have been proved, (then
your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the defendant’s affirmative
defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete defense to the plaintiff’s
claim]).
If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative
defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be
for the defendant.
(In determining whether the affirmative defense of privilege [describe privilege] has
been proved, you must also determine whether the plaintiff proved by a preponderance of
the evidence that the defendant abused that privilege as explained in Instruction No. [insert
instruction number that corresponds to 24:6].)
However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these
affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
97f3602adba0f14d044e530282aac169d752eec0f7332287a32aaf265d3297b6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.