CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 22:18
Affirmative Defense — Qualified Privilege — When Lost
(When the defendant published the statement[s] in question [insert applicable
pronoun] was privileged to do so, because [describe the basic purpose of the privilege,
including what and whose interest the privilege is intended to protect, e.g., “an employee is
allowed to inform his or her employer of wrongdoing of a fellow employee for the purpose of
protecting the employer’s business”].)
(The defendant has the burden of proving the affirmative defense of privilege. If you
find that [describe the facts which, if proved, would give rise to the privilege as a matter of
law], then you must find that when the defendant published the statement[s] in question,
[insert applicable pronoun] was privileged to do so because [describe the purpose of the
privilege, including what and whose interest the privilege is intended to protect].)
(Because) (If) the defendant was privileged to publish the statement(s), then the
defendant is not legally responsible to the plaintiff and your verdict must be for the
defendant (unless the defendant abused the privilege. The existence of a privilege does not
protect the defendant if [insert applicable pronoun] abused the privilege).
(The affirmative defense of privilege is lost if the plaintiff proves the defendant
abused the privilege. The defendant abused the privilege if you find that when [insert
applicable pronoun] published the statement[s] in question:
1. [Insert applicable pronoun] knew the statement[s] to be false, or acted with
reckless disregard for whether the statement[s] [was] [were] false; or
2. [Insert applicable pronoun] acted primarily for purposes other than the protection
of the interest for which the privilege was given; or
3. [Insert applicable pronoun] knowingly published the statement[s] to [a person]
[persons] to whom its publication was not otherwise privileged, unless [insert applicable
pronoun] reasonably believed that the publication was a proper means of communicating
such matter to the person[s] to whom its publication was privileged; or
4. [Insert applicable pronoun] did not reasonably believe the publication of the
statement[s] to be necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the privilege was given.)
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
ff6dccd7ce36e42b27a5b8db023865a42257a998fdaafb31bddbf047ede84033
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.