Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 21:11

Privilege of Peace Officer to Arrest Without a Warrant

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant, (name), is not legally responsible to the plaintiff, (name), on (insert

applicable pronoun) claim of (false imprisonment) (false arrest) if the affirmative defense of

a privilege to arrest without a warrant is proved (and you do not find such privilege, if any,

was abused). The defendant was privileged to arrest the plaintiff without a warrant if you

find (any of) the following (has) (have) been proved:

(1. [Insert any of the privileges afforded a private person in Instruction 21:10 which may

be applicable]) (or)

(2. a. The defendant was a peace officer acting within the scope of [insert applicable

pronoun] authority at the time of the arrest; and

b. The plaintiff had committed or was committing a criminal offense in the presence

of the defendant; and

c. The defendant arrested the plaintiff for that offense) (or)

(3. a. The defendant was a peace officer acting within the scope of [insert applicable

pronoun] authority at the time of the arrest; and

b. The defendant believed and had probable cause to believe that a criminal offense

had been committed, whether it had or not; and

c. The defendant believed and had probable cause to believe the plaintiff had

committed that criminal offense; and

d. The defendant arrested the plaintiff for that offense).

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
d11cf7843840820d920c895313b6ae839e01f270026389bfce07a0b142bb2ee0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.