CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 20:1
Elements of Liability
For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable
pronoun) claim of assault, you must find that all of the following have been proved by a
preponderance of the evidence:
1. The defendant intended to cause an offensive or harmful physical contact with the
plaintiff or intended to place the plaintiff in apprehension of such contact; and
2. The defendant placed the plaintiff in apprehension of immediate physical contact;
and
(3. That contact [was] [appeared to be] [harmful] [or] [offensive].)
If you find that any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved,
then your verdict must be for the defendant.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been
proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the
defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete
defense to plaintiff’s claim]).
If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative
defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be
for the defendant.
However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these
affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
7b245d2513ae99c53d8512315a93b56628c8883e9993ade45af33a97724eb4a3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.