CO · jury_instructions
CJI-Civ. 15:9
Affirmative Defense — Implied Consent Based on Emergency
The defendant, (name), is not legally responsible to the plaintiff, (name), on (insert
applicable pronoun) claim of battery if the affirmative defense of implied consent based on
an emergency is proved. This defense is proved if you find all of the following:
1. At the time the defendant treated the plaintiff, the defendant reasonably believed
the plaintiff’s life or health was in such danger that to delay (surgery) (treatment) would
further endanger the plaintiff’s life or health;
2. Under the same or similar circumstances, a reasonably careful physician would
have believed the same thing; and
3. The plaintiff was in a mental or physical condition that prevented (insert
applicable pronoun) from being able to indicate (insert applicable pronoun) consent or lack of
consent.
History
CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".
Provenance
- Source
- www.coloradojudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- civ-2026-02-25
- Content hash
b3a544793f5032957c818349128c63d8c98dba23ae7e77b17c5a7727de069a9a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.