Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 14:5

Presumptions — Noncompliance with Governmental Standards

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

“Presumptions” are legal rules based on experience or public policy. They are

established in the law to assist the jury in ascertaining the truth.

In this case, if you find that at the time (name of defendant if a “manufacturer”) (name

of “manufacturer” if other than defendant) sold (description of product), (1) the product did

not comply with any applicable code, standard, or regulation of the United States or the

State of Colorado or any of their agencies, and (2) that the lack of compliance was a cause

of the plaintiff’s claimed (injuries) (damages) (losses), then the law presumes that (the

[description of product] was defective) (the [name of defendant] was negligent) (the

[description of product] did not comply with any warranty of [insert description]).

You must consider this presumption together with all the other evidence in the case

in deciding whether (the [description of product] was defective) (the [name of defendant]

was negligent) (the [description of product] complied with any warranty of [insert

description]).

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
005a68d7a2f06e0243fb32cba897df08c8481054c8c0645117291ed479ddb610
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.