Bindinglaw

CO · jury_instructions

CJI-Civ. 12:6

Liability of Owner or Occupant to Persons Injured Off the Premises — Elements of Liability

activein force · 2026-02-25 – presentcompiled-edition

For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (insert applicable

pronoun) claim of negligence, you must find all the following numbered propositions have

been proved:

1. At the time of the occurrence, the defendant (owned) (occupied) (controlled)

(conducted activities on) the premises;

2. (A condition existed) (An activity was conducted) on the premises which created

an unreasonable risk of (injury) (damage) (loss) to (persons such as the plaintiff) (the

property of persons such as the plaintiff);

(3. [Either]

[a. This condition (was created by the defendant) (or) (was of a continuous nature or

was reasonably foreseeable because of the defendant’s operating methods)]

[or]

[b. This condition was one the defendant knew of, or reasonably should have known

of, in sufficient time to have (removed it) (corrected it) (or) (adequately warned persons

that the condition was there) so that injury could have been prevented, and [insert

applicable pronoun] failed to do so];)

4. The defendant was negligent because (insert applicable pronoun) failed to use

reasonable care (in the management or maintenance of [insert applicable pronoun]

premises) (with respect to the operation of [insert applicable pronoun] business on the

premises) (with respect to the conduct of [insert applicable pronoun] activities on the

premises) (or) (to [remove] [correct] [or] [give adequate warning of] the condition);

5. The plaintiff had (injuries) (damages) (losses); and

6. The defendant’s negligence was a cause of the plaintiff’s (injuries) (damages)

(losses).

If you find that any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved

by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be for the defendant.

On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been

proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the

defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete

defense to plaintiff’s claim]).

If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative

defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be

for the defendant.

However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these

affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.

History

CJI-Civ. (2026), Colorado Supreme Court Committee on Pattern Civil Jury Instructions. Dated 2026-02-25 by the committee page's "Revised 2/25/26".

Provenance

Source
www.coloradojudicial.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
civ-2026-02-25
Content hash
6299ed55cdc4ab76bdf7aff6c59d66cf55298750091a0a81302232f4312f78d3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CJI-Civ. 12:6 — Liability of Owner or Occupant to Per… · binding.law