CA · rules
Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.440
Related cases
Where resources permit, courts should identify cases related to a pending family law case to avoid issuing conflicting orders and make effective use of court resources.
(a) Definition of "related case"
For purposes of this rule, a pending family law case is related to another pending case, or to a case that was dismissed with or without prejudice, or to a case that was disposed of by judgment, if the cases:
(1) Involve the same parties or the parties' minor children;
(2) Are based on issues governed by the Family Code or by the guardianship provisions of the Probate Code; or
(3) Are likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.
(b) Confidential information
Other than forms providing custody and visitation (parenting time) orders to be filed in the family court, where the identification of a related case includes a disclosure of information relating to a juvenile dependency or delinquency matter involving the children of the parties in the pending family law case, the clerk must file that information in the confidential portion of the court file.
(c) Coordination of title IV-D cases
To the extent possible, courts should coordinate title IV-D (government child support) cases with other related family law matters.
History
Rule 5.440 adopted effective January 1, 2013.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
b6ffacf817dea778e1f95a25c59bf98d4b0e09dffd49b9237a82a611772cac3e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.