CA · rules
Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.200
Pre-voir dire conference in criminal cases
(a) The conference
Before jury selection begins in criminal cases, the court must conduct a conference with counsel to determine:
(1) A brief outline of the nature of the case, including a summary of the criminal charges;
(2) The names of persons counsel intend to call as witnesses at trial;
(3) The People's theory of culpability and the defendant's theories;
(4) The procedures for deciding requests for excuse for hardship and challenges for cause;
(5) The areas of inquiry and specific questions to be asked by the court and by counsel and any time limits on counsel's examination;
(6) The schedule for the trial and the predicted length of the trial;
(7) The number of alternate jurors to be selected and the procedure for selecting them; and
(8) The procedure for making objections pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 231.7(b).
The judge must, if requested, excuse the defendant from then disclosing any defense theory.
(b) Written questions
The court may require counsel to submit in writing, and before the conference, all questions that counsel requests the court to ask of prospective jurors. This rule applies to questions to be asked either orally or by written questionnaire. The Juror Questionnaire for Criminal Cases (form JURY-002) may be used.
History
(Subd (a) amended effective March 14, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2006, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended effective, January 1, 2026; previously amended effective January 1, 2006.) Rule 4.200 amended effective January 1, 2026; adopted as rule 228.1 effective June 6, 1990; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2006, January 1, 2007, and March 14, 2022.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
8b1a5319df60e6315ce84ec8b32e77e77f67ac62d9883b9c33205a7c21e19b95
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.