CA · rules
Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.550
General administration by Judicial Council staff
(a) Coordination attorney
Except as otherwise provided in the rules in this chapter, all necessary administrative functions under this chapter will be performed at the direction of the Chair of the Judicial Council by a coordination attorney.
(b) Duties of coordination attorney
The coordination attorney must at all times maintain:
(1) A list of active and retired judges who are qualified and currently available to conduct coordination proceedings; and
(2) A register of all coordination proceedings and a file for each proceeding, for public inspection during regular business hours at the San Francisco office of the Judicial Council.
(c) Coordination proceeding title and case number
The coordination attorney must assign each coordination proceeding a special title and coordination proceeding number. Thereafter all papers in that proceeding must bear that title and number.
History
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2005; previously adopted as part of subd (a) effective January 1, 2005.) (Subd (c) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2005; adopted as subd (b).) Rule 3.550 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as rule 1550 effective January 1, 1974; previously amended effective January 1, 2005; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.550 effective January 1, 2007.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
6aae02278cfcb5fc1ea772365c1cf000f9f366a6ace7e05806c2e949c16f13f9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.