Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 985

Brandishing Imitation Firearm (Pen. Code, § 417.4)

activein force · 2019-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant is charged [in Count] with brandishing an

imitation firearm [in violation of Penal Code section 417.4].

To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must

prove that:

1. The defendant drew or exhibited an imitation firearm in a

threatening manner against another person;

2. The defendant’s act caused someone to fear bodily harm to

himself or herself or someone else;

[AND]

3. That fear of harm was reasonable(;/.)

<Give element 4 when instructing on self-defense or defense of another .>

[AND

4. When the defendant drew or exhibited the imitation firearm, (he/

she) was not acting (in self-defense/ [or] in defense of someone

else).]

An imitation firearm is a device[, or a toy gun, replica of a firearm, gun -

shaped phone case, or BB device,] that is so substantially similar to a

real firearm in color and overall appearance that a reasonable person

would believe that it is a real firearm. [A BB device is an instrument that

expels a projectile, such as a BB or other pellet, either 6 millimeters or 8

millimeters in caliber, through the force of air pressure, gas pressure, or

spring action, or any spot marker gun that expels a projectile 10

millimeters or less in caliber.]

New January 2006; Revised February 2012, February 2016, September 2017

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2019
Content hash
1bb2f93f5a335872a71aab6837441b062e50bc600108ec23b9209843f959e81e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.