Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 967

Shooting at Unoccupied Aircraft (Pen. Code, § 247(a))

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant is charged [in Count] with shooting at an

unoccupied aircraft [in violation of Penal Code section 247(a)].

To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must

prove that:

1. The defendant willfully and maliciously shot a firearm;

[AND]

2. The defendant shot the firearm at an unoccupied aircraft(;/.)

<Give element 3 when instructing on self-defense or defense of another .>

[AND

3. The defendant did not act (in self-defense/ [or] in defense of

someone else).]

Someone commits an act willfully when he or she does it willingly or on

purpose. It is not required that he or she intend to break the law, hurt

someone else, or gain any advantage.

Someone acts maliciously when he or she intentionally does a wrongful

act or when he or she acts with the unlawful intent to disturb, defraud,

annoy, or injure someone else.

[An aircraft is an airplane or other craft intended for and capable of

transporting persons through the air.]

[A firearm is any device designed to be used as a weapon, from which a

projectile is discharged or expelled through a barrel by the force of an

explosion or other form of combustion.]

[The term[s] (firearm/ <insert other term>) (is/are) defined in

another instruction to which you should refer.]

New January 2006; Revised February 2012, February 2026

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2026
Content hash
ad8830f3b31c582e9982703341a8aee11620d05b95230c40ce392a7b54834433
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.