Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 917

Insulting Words Are Not a Defense

activein force · 2020-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Words, no matter how offensive, and acts that are not threatening, are

not enough to justify an assault or battery.

[However, if you conclude that <insert name> spoke or

acted in a way that threatened <insert name of defendant or

third party allegedly threatened> with immediate harm [or an unlawful

touching]/ [or] great bodily injury/ [or] trespass on land/ [or] trespass

against goods], you may consider that evidence in deciding whether

<insert name of defendant> acted in (self-defense/ [or]

defense of others).]

New January 2006

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2020
Content hash
2e8700301c982cdcead17591811dc9fda8d7c2f40ba919168c38576d4e9ec6c1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CALCRIM No. 917 — Insulting Words Are Not a Defense · binding.law