Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 850

Testimony on Intimate Partner Battering and Its Effects:

activein force · 2023-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Credibility of Complaining Witness

Y ou have heard testimony from <insert name of expert>

regarding the effect of (battered women’s syndrome/intimate partner

battering/ <insert other description used by expert for

syndrome>).

(Battered women’s syndrome/Intimate partner battering and its effects/

<insert other description used by expert for syndrome>) relate

to a pattern of behavior that may be present in domestic abuse cases.

Testimony as to (battered women’s syndrome/the effects of intimate

partner battering/ <insert other description used by expert for

syndrome>) is offered only to explain certain behavior of an alleged

victim of domestic abuse.

’s <insert name of expert> testimony about (battered

women’s syndrome/intimate partner battering/ <insert other

description used by expert for syndrome>) is not evidence that the

defendant committed any of the crimes charged against (him/her) [or

any conduct or crime[s] with which (he/she) was not charged].

Y ou may consider this evidence only in deciding whether or not

’s <insert name of alleged victim of abuse> conduct was

consistent with the conduct of someone who has been abused and in

evaluating the believability of (his/her) testimony.

New January 2006; Revised March 2017, April 2020, September 2022

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2023
Content hash
3338c9569b4423d5650f6788dcb0360de97c6f720185cd1ba4a73d8eea5d34cd
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CALCRIM No. 850 — Testimony on Intimate Partner Batte… · binding.law