CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 763
Death Penalty: Factors to Consider—Not Identified as
Aggravating or Mitigating (Pen. Code, § 190.3)
In reaching your decision, you must consider and weigh the aggravating
and mitigating circumstances or factors shown by the evidence.
An aggravating circumstance or factor is any fact, condition, or event
relating to the commission of a crime, above and beyond the elements of
the crime itself, that increases the wrongfulness of the defendant’s
conduct, the enormity of the offense, or the harmful impact of the crime.
An aggravating circumstance may support a decision to impose the
death penalty.
A mitigating circumstance or factor is any fact, condition, or event that
makes the death penalty less appropriate as a punishment, even though
it does not legally justify or excuse the crime. A mitigating circumstance
is something that reduces the defendant’s blameworthiness or otherwise
supports a less severe punishment. A mitigating circumstance may
support a decision not to impose the death penalty.
Under the law, you must consider, weigh, and be guided by specific
factors, where applicable, some of which may be aggravating and some
of which may be mitigating. I will read you the entire list of factors.
Some of them may not apply to this case. If you find there is no evidence
of a factor, then you should disregard that factor.
The factors are:
(a) The circumstances of the crime[s] of which the defendant was
convicted in this case and any special circumstances that were
found true
(b) Whether or not the defendant has engaged in violent criminal
activity other than the crime[s] of which the defendant was
convicted in this case. Violent criminal activity is criminal activity
involving the unlawful use, attempt to use, or direct or implied
threat to use force or violence against a person. [The other violent
criminal activity alleged in this case will be described in these
instructions.]
(c) Whether or not the defendant has been convicted of any prior
felony other than the crime[s] of which (he/she) was convicted in
this case.
(d) Whether the defendant was under the influence of extreme
mental or emotional disturbance when (he/she) committed the
crime[s] of which (he/she) was convicted in this case.
(e) Whether the victim participated in the defendant’s homicidal
conduct or consented to the homicidal act.
(f) Whether the defendant reasonably believed that circumstances
morally justified or extenuated (his/her) conduct in committing
the crime[s] of which (he/she) was convicted in this case.
(g) Whether at the time of the murder the defendant acted under
extreme duress or under the substantial domination of another
person.
(h) Whether, at the time of the offense, the defendant’s capacity to
appreciate the criminality of (his/her) conduct or to follow the
requirements of the law was impaired as a result of mental
disease, defect, or intoxication.
(i) The defendant’s age at the time of the crime[s] of which (he/she)
was convicted in this case.
(j) The defendant’s age at the time of the crime[s] of which (he/she)
was convicted in this case.
(k) Any other circumstance, whether related to these charges or not,
that lessens the gravity of the crime[s] even though the
circumstance is not a legal excuse or justification. These
circumstances include sympathy or compassion for the defendant
or anything you consider to be a mitigating factor, regardless of
whether it is one of the factors listed above.
[Y ou must disregard any jury instruction given to you in the guilt [and
sanity] phase[s] of this trial if it conflicts with your consideration and
weighing of these factors.]
Do not consider the absence of a mitigating factor as an aggravating
factor.
[Y ou may not consider as an aggravating factor anything other than the
factors contained in this list that you conclude are aggravating in this
case. Y ou must not take into account any other facts or circumstances as
a basis for imposing the death penalty.]
[Even if a fact is both a “special circumstance” and also a “circumstance
of the crime,” you may consider that fact only once as an aggravating
factor in your weighing process. Do not double-count that fact simply
because it is both a “special circumstance” and a “circumstance of the
crime.”]
[Although you may consider sympathy or compassion for the defendant,
you may not let sympathy for the defendant’s family influence your
decision. [However, you may consider evidence about the impact the
defendant’s execution would have on (his/her) family if that evidence
demonstrates some positive quality of the defendant’s background or
HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 763
character.]]
New January 2006; Revised August 2006, June 2007, April 2008, December 2008,
March 2021, March 2023, September 2023
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2024
- Content hash
9201a18c5e5c6ab1c35b57cc9fcd059288bcc39f4089e6456bd8aabccc2278f3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.