CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 751
Second Degree Murder With Prior Prison for Murder (Pen.
Code, § 190.05)
The defendant is charged with the additional allegation of having
previously served a prison term for murder. Y ou must now decide if the
People have proved this allegation.
To prove that this allegation is true, the People must prove that:
1. The defendant was convicted previously of murder in the (first/
second) degree;
AND
2. The defendant served time in prison as a result of that conviction.
[A conviction of <insert name of offense from other state> is
the same as a conviction for (first/second) degree murder.]
[For the purpose of this allegation, serving time in <insert
name of institution from Pen. Code, § 190.05> qualifies as serving time in
prison.]
<Limiting instruction alternative A—bifurcated trial>
[In deciding whether the People have proved this allegation, consider
only the evidence presented in this proceeding. Do not consider your
verdict or any evidence from the earlier part of the trial.]
<Limiting instruction alternative B—nonbifurcated trial>
[Consider the evidence presented on this allegation only when deciding
whether the defendant was previously convicted of the crime[s] alleged
[or for the limited purpose of <insert other permitted
purpose, e.g., assessing credibility of the defendant>]. Do not consider this
evidence for any other purpose.]
[Y ou may not return a finding that this allegation has or has not been
proved unless all 12 of you agree on that finding.]
New January 2006
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2019
- Content hash
5089ec28659cd45a5020c417ea429d65a4eeb59efadaa4e229b4ebf2b6df921a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.