CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 732
Special Circumstances: Murder in Commission of
Felony—Arson With Intent to Kill (Pen. Code, § 190.2(a)(17))
The defendant is charged with the special circumstance of intentional
murder while engaged in the commission of arson that burned an
(inhabited structure/[or] inhabited property) [in violation of Penal Code
section 190.2(a)(17)].
To prove that this special circumstance is true, the People must prove
that:
1. The defendant (committed [or attempted to commit][,]/ [or] aided
and abetted[,]/ [or] was a member of a conspiracy to commit)
arson that burned an (inhabited structure/[or] inhabited
property);
2. The defendant (intended to commit[,]/ [or] intended to aid and
abet the perpetrator in committing[,]/ [or] intended that one or
more of the members of the conspiracy commit) arson that
burned an (inhabited structure/[or] inhabited property);
<Give element 3 if defendant did not personally commit or attempt
arson.>
[3. If the defendant did not personally commit [or attempt to
commit] arson, then another perpetrator, (whom the defendant
was aiding and abetting/ [or] with whom the defendant
conspired), personally committed [or attempted to commit] arson
that burned an (inhabited structure/[or] inhabited property);]
(3/4). The commission [or attempted commission] of the arson was a
substantial factor in causing the death of another person;
AND
(4/5). The defendant intended that the other person be killed.
To decide whether (the defendant/ [and] the perpetrator) committed [or
attempted to commit] arson that burned an (inhabited structure/[or]
inhabited property), please refer to the separate instructions that I (will
give/have given) you on that crime. [To decide whether the defendant
aided and abetted the crime, please refer to the separate instructions
that I (will give/have given) you on aiding and abetting.] [To decide
whether the defendant was a member of a conspiracy to commit the
crime, please refer to the separate instructions that I (will give/have
given) you on conspiracy.] Y ou must apply those instructions when you
decide whether the People have proved this special circumstance.
<Make certain that all appropriate instructions on underlying arson, aiding
and abetting, and conspiracy are given.>
An act causes death if the death is the direct, natural, and probable
consequence of the act and the death would not have happened without
the act. A natural and probable consequence is one that a reasonable
person would know is likely to happen if nothing unusual intervenes. In
deciding whether a consequence is natural and probable, consider all the
circumstances established by the evidence.
There may be more than one cause of death. An act causes death only if
it is a substantial factor in causing the death. A substantial factor is more
than a trivial or remote factor. However, it does not need to be the only
factor that causes the death.
[If all the listed elements are proved, you may find this special
circumstance true even if the defendant intended solely to commit
murder and the commission of arson was merely part of or incidental to
the commission of that murder.]
New January 2006; Revised August 2013, August 2016, September 2019
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2023
- Content hash
2a5e3952b86e7bbcc9e270e80b1c3bd7ef771feaa1b8a9fd84aa3ebac9583112
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.