CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 731
Special Circumstances: Murder in Commission of
Felony—Kidnapping With Intent to Kill After March 8, 2000 (Pen.
Code, § 190.2(a)(17))
The defendant is charged with the special circumstance of intentional
murder while engaged in the commission of kidnapping [in violation of
Penal Code section 190.2(a)(17)].
To prove that this special circumstance is true, the People must prove
that:
1. The defendant (committed [or attempted to commit][,]/ [or] aided
and abetted[,]/ [or] was a member of a conspiracy to commit)
kidnapping;
2. The defendant (intended to commit[,]/ [or] intended to aid and
abet the perpetrator in committing[,]/ [or] intended that one or
more of the members of the conspiracy commit) kidnapping;
<Give element 3 if defendant did not personally commit or attempt
kidnapping.>
[3. If the defendant did not personally commit [or attempt to
commit] kidnapping, then another perpetrator, (whom the
defendant was aiding and abetting/ [or] with whom the defendant
conspired), personally committed [or attempted to commit]
kidnapping;]
(3/4). (The defendant/ <insert name or description of person
causing death if not defendant>) did an act that was a substantial
factor in causing the death of another person;
AND
(4/5). The defendant intended that the other person be killed.
To decide whether (the defendant/ [and] the perpetrator) committed [or
attempted to commit] kidnapping, please refer to the separate
instructions that I (will give/have given) you on that crime. [To decide
whether the defendant aided and abetted the crime, please refer to the
separate instructions that I (will give/have given) you on aiding and
abetting.] [To decide whether the defendant was a member of a
conspiracy to commit the crime, please refer to the separate instructions
that I (will give/have given) you on conspiracy.] Y ou must apply those
instructions when you decide whether the People have proved this
special circumstance.
<Make certain that all appropriate instructions on underlying kidnapping,
aiding and abetting, and conspiracy are given.>
An act causes death if the death is the direct, natural, and probable
consequence of the act and the death would not have happened without
the act. A natural and probable consequence is one that a reasonable
person would know is likely to happen if nothing unusual intervenes. In
deciding whether a consequence is natural and probable, consider all the
circumstances established by the evidence.
There may be more than one cause of death. An act causes death only if
it is a substantial factor in causing the death. A substantial factor is more
than a trivial or remote factor. However, it does not need to be the only
factor that causes the death.
[If all the listed elements are proved, you may find this special
circumstance true even if the defendant intended solely to commit
murder and the commission of kidnapping was merely part of or
incidental to the commission of that murder.]
New January 2006; Revised August 2013, August 2016
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2023
- Content hash
95747e18af0285046fc0b9678fba7a0117947a44de9689de3e6ed7ada8383390
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.