Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 570

Voluntary Manslaughter: Heat of Passion—Lesser Included

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

Offense (Pen. Code, § 192(a))

A killing that would otherwise be murder is reduced to voluntary

manslaughter if the defendant killed someone because of a sudden

quarrel or in the heat of passion.

The defendant killed someone because of a sudden quarrel or in the heat

of passion if:

1. The defendant was provoked;

2. As a result of the provocation, the defendant acted rashly and

under the influence of intense emotion that obscured (his/her)

reasoning or judgment;

AND

3. The provocation would have caused a person of average

disposition to act rashly and without due deliberation, that is,

from passion rather than from judgment.

Heat of passion does not require anger, rage, or any specific emotion. It

can be any violent or intense emotion that causes a person to act without

due deliberation and reflection.

In order for heat of passion to reduce a murder to voluntary

manslaughter, the defendant must have acted under the direct and

immediate influence of provocation. While no specific type of provocation

is required, slight or remote provocation is not sufficient. Sufficient

provocation may occur over a short or long period of time.

It is not enough that the defendant simply was provoked. The defendant

is not allowed to set up (his/her) own standard of conduct. Y ou must

decide whether the defendant was provoked and whether the provocation

was sufficient. In deciding whether the provocation was sufficient,

consider whether a person of average disposition, in the same situation

and knowing the same facts, would have reacted from passion rather

than from judgment.

[If enough time passed between the provocation and the killing for a

person of average disposition to “cool off” and regain his or her clear

reasoning and judgment, then the killing is not reduced to voluntary

manslaughter on this basis.]

The People have the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that

the defendant did not kill as the result of a sudden quarrel or in the heat

of passion. If the People have not met this burden, you must find the

defendant not guilty of murder.

New January 2006; Revised December 2008, February 2014, August 2015,

September 2024

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2025
Content hash
18f8f08a0a1ded495e8c7e14984e65c2dd3f49a24e48a1f2a2ebd9f3432bd4ad
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.