Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 360

Statements to an Expert

activein force · 2020-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

<Insert name> testified that in reaching (his/her)

conclusions as an expert witness, (he/she) considered [a] statement[s]

made by <insert name>. [I am referring only to the

statement[s] <insert or describe statements admitted for this

limited purpose>.] Y ou may consider (that/those) statement[s] only to

evaluate the expert’s opinion. Do not consider (that/those) statement[s] as

proof that the information contained in the statement[s] is true.

New January 2006; Revised March 2018

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2020
Content hash
e6f0efd7a4e0c7a273558970f39c28e9fc6cbb21a445391441c38711287ee4ac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.