Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 3477

Presumption That Resident Was Reasonably Afraid of Death

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

or Great Bodily Injury (Pen. Code, § 198.5)

The law presumes that the defendant reasonably feared imminent death

or great bodily injury to (himself/herself)[, or to a member of (his/her)

family or household,] if:

1. An intruder unlawfully and forcibly (entered/[or] was entering)

the defendant’s home;

2. The defendant knew [or reasonably believed] that an intruder

unlawfully and forcibly (entered/[or] was entering) the

defendant’s home;

3. The intruder was not a member of the defendant’s household or

family;

AND

4. The defendant used force intended to or likely to cause death or

great bodily injury to the intruder inside the home.

[Great bodily injury means significant or substantial physical injury. It is

an injury that is greater than moderate harm.]

The People have the burden of overcoming this presumption. This means

that the People must prove that the defendant did not have a reasonable

fear of imminent death or injury to (himself/herself)[, or to a member of

his or her family or household,] when (he/she) used force against the

intruder. If the People have not met this burden, you must find the

defendant reasonably feared death or injury to (himself/herself)[, or to a

member of his or her family or household].

New January 2006; Revised March 2017, September 2020, October 2025

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2026
Content hash
c7196a09d27f42279040ef7a6e80aa70531fa2e400755f1250d2a0a1714eb332
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CALCRIM No. 3477 — Presumption That Resident Was Reas… · binding.law