Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 3471

Right to Self-Defense: Mutual Combat or Initial Aggressor

activein force · 2020-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

A person who (engages in mutual combat/ [or who] starts a fight) has a

right to self-defense only if:

1. (He/She) actually and in good faith tried to stop fighting;

[AND]

2. (He/She) indicated, by word or by conduct, to (his/her) opponent,

in a way that a reasonable person would understand, that (he/she)

wanted to stop fighting and that (he/she) had stopped fighting(;/.)

<Give element 3 in cases of mutual combat.>

[AND

3. (He/She) gave (his/her) opponent a chance to stop fighting.]

If the defendant meets these requirements, (he/she) then had a right to

self-defense if the opponent continued to fight.

[However, if the defendant used only non-deadly force, and the opponent

responded with such sudden and deadly force that the defendant could

not withdraw from the fight, then the defendant had the right to defend

(himself/herself) with deadly force and was not required to try to stop

fighting(,/ or) communicate the desire to stop to the opponent[, or give

the opponent a chance to stop fighting].]

[A fight is mutual combat when it began or continued by mutual consent

or agreement. That agreement may be expressly stated or implied and

must occur before the claim to self-defense arose.]

New January 2006; Revised April 2008, December 2008, April 2011, February 2013

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2020
Content hash
d547e1adc65027ea9ba7a5626708b0fc7e4208f6d4ed5d0c52012094ca407d58
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.