CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 3457
Extension of Commitment as Offender With A Mental Health
Disorder (Pen. Code, § 2970)
The petition alleges that <insert name of respondent> is an
offender with a mental health disorder.
To prove this allegation, the People must prove beyond a reasonable
doubt that [at the time of (his/her) hearing before the Board of Parole
Hearings]:
1. (He/She) (has/had) a severe mental disorder;
2. The severe mental disorder (is/was) not in remission or (cannot/
could not) be kept in remission without continued treatment;
AND
3. Because of (his/her) severe mental disorder, (he/she) (presently
represents/represented) a substantial danger of physical harm to
others.
A severe mental disorder is an illness or disease or condition that
substantially impairs the person’s thought, perception of reality,
emotional process, or judgment; or that grossly impairs his or her
behavior; or that demonstrates evidence of an acute brain syndrome for
which prompt remission, in the absence of treatment, is unlikely. [It does
not include (a personality or adjustment disorder[,]/ [or] epilepsy[,]/ [or]
mental retardation or other developmental disabilities[,]/ [or] addiction
to or abuse of intoxicating substances).]
Remission means that the external signs and symptoms of the severe
mental disorder are controlled by either psychotropic medication or
psychosocial support.
[A severe mental disorder cannot be kept in remission without treatment
if, during the period of the year prior to <insert the date the
trial commenced> , the person:
<Give one or more alternatives, as applicable.>
[1. Was physically violent except in self-defense(;/.) [or]]
[2. Made a serious threat of substantial physical harm upon the
person of another so as to cause the target of the threat to
reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her
immediate family(;/.) [or]]
[3. Intentionally caused property damage(;/.) [or]]
[4. Did not voluntarily follow the treatment plan.]]
[A person has voluntarily followed the treatment plan if he or she has
acted as a reasonable person would in following the treatment plan.]
[A substantial danger of physical harm does not require proof of a recent
overt act.]
Y ou will receive [a] verdict form[s] on which to indicate your finding of
whether the allegation that <insert name of respondent> is
an offender with a mental health disorder is true or not true. To find the
allegation true or not true, all of you must agree. Y ou may not find it to
be true unless all of you agree the People have proved it beyond a
reasonable doubt.
New December 2008; Revised September 2017, September 2020, September 2022
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2023
- Content hash
40fc10af121f9389658a73595c93a5ffb0497d3b43fbc12eef7859bee5064e99
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.