CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 3452
Determining Restoration to Sanity (Pen. Code, § 1026.2)
The defendant was previously found not guilty of a crime and committed
to a mental health facility. Y ou must decide whether the defendant
currently poses a danger to the health and safety of others as a result of
a mental disease, defect, or disorder. That is the only purpose of this
proceeding. Y ou are not being asked to decide the defendant’s mental
condition at any other time or whether (he/she) is guilty of any crime.
<Alternative A—defendant’ s ability to continue unsupervised self-medication
not an issue>
[The law presumes that the defendant currently poses a danger to the
health and safety of others as a result of a mental disease, defect, or
disorder. In order to overcome this presumption, the defendant has the
burden of proving that it is more likely than not that (he/she) no longer
poses such a danger.]
<Alternative B—defendant’ s ability to continue unsupervised self-medication
an issue>
[The law presumes that the defendant currently poses a danger to the
health and safety of others as a result of a mental disease, defect, or
disorder. In order to overcome this presumption, the defendant has the
burden of proving that it is more likely than not that:
1. (He/She) is no longer a danger to the health and safety of others
because (he/she) is now taking prescribed medicine that controls
(his/her) mental condition;
AND
2. (He/She) will continue to take that medicine in an unsupervised
environment.]
New January 2006
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2021
- Content hash
711f6ce875f0bb96db219c2411706f34bd8b23dced3b2ba0f5ca592355c0d7dc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.