Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 3452

Determining Restoration to Sanity (Pen. Code, § 1026.2)

activein force · 2021-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant was previously found not guilty of a crime and committed

to a mental health facility. Y ou must decide whether the defendant

currently poses a danger to the health and safety of others as a result of

a mental disease, defect, or disorder. That is the only purpose of this

proceeding. Y ou are not being asked to decide the defendant’s mental

condition at any other time or whether (he/she) is guilty of any crime.

<Alternative A—defendant’ s ability to continue unsupervised self-medication

not an issue>

[The law presumes that the defendant currently poses a danger to the

health and safety of others as a result of a mental disease, defect, or

disorder. In order to overcome this presumption, the defendant has the

burden of proving that it is more likely than not that (he/she) no longer

poses such a danger.]

<Alternative B—defendant’ s ability to continue unsupervised self-medication

an issue>

[The law presumes that the defendant currently poses a danger to the

health and safety of others as a result of a mental disease, defect, or

disorder. In order to overcome this presumption, the defendant has the

burden of proving that it is more likely than not that:

1. (He/She) is no longer a danger to the health and safety of others

because (he/she) is now taking prescribed medicine that controls

(his/her) mental condition;

AND

2. (He/She) will continue to take that medicine in an unsupervised

environment.]

New January 2006

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2021
Content hash
711f6ce875f0bb96db219c2411706f34bd8b23dced3b2ba0f5ca592355c0d7dc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.