CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 3428
Mental Impairment: Defense to Specific Intent or Mental
State (Pen. Code, § 28)
Y ou have heard evidence that the defendant may have suffered from a
mental (disease[,]/ [or] defect[,]/ [or] disorder). Y ou may consider this
evidence only for the limited purpose of deciding whether, at the time of
the charged crime, the defendant acted [or failed to act] with the intent
or mental state required for that crime.
The People have the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that
the defendant acted [or failed to act] with the required intent or mental
state, specifically: <insert specific intent or mental state
required, e.g., “malice aforethought,” “the intent to permanently deprive the
owner of his or her property,” or “knowledge that . . .”> . If the People
have not met this burden, you must find the defendant not guilty of
<insert name of alleged offense>.
<Repeat this paragraph for each offense requiring specific intent or a
specific mental state.>
[Do not consider evidence of mental (disease[,]/ [or] defect[,]/ [or]
disorder) when deciding if <insert name of nontarget
offense> was a natural and probable consequence of <insert
name of target offense>.]
New January 2006; Revised March 2017
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2021
- Content hash
0338e2ab290e27642240bab397f5bb4f0a480d74597aa445e2eb326aa71e11d3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.