Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 333

Opinion Testimony of Lay Witness

activein force · 2019-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

(A witness/Witnesses)[, who (was/were) not testifying as [an] expert[s],]

gave (his/her/their) opinion[s] during the trial. Y ou may but are not

required to accept (that/those) opinion[s] as true or correct. Y ou may

give the opinion[s] whatever weight you think appropriate. Consider the

extent of the witness’s opportunity to perceive the matters on which his

or her opinion is based, the reasons the witness gave for any opinion,

and the facts or information on which the witness relied in forming that

opinion. Y ou must decide whether information on which the witness

relied was true and accurate. Y ou may disregard all or any part of an

opinion that you find unbelievable, unreasonable, or unsupported by the

evidence.

New January 2006

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2019
Content hash
45e6962c4741a5083d4fcd8895171ed7584c35b59abd684144411fca10633685
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.