Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 3225

Aggravating Factor: Armed or Used Weapon

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

<Introductory paragraph for nonbifurcated trial>

[If you find the defendant guilty of the crime[s] charged [in Count[s]

][or of attempting to commit (that/those) crime[s]][or the lesser

crime[s] of <insert lesser offense[s]>], you must then decide

whether[, for each crime,] the People have proved the additional

allegation[s] that the defendant was armed with or used a weapon, to

wit: <insert description of weapon>, during commission of

the crime[s] in Count[s] .]

<Introductory paragraph for bifurcated trial>

[The People have alleged that the defendant was armed with or used a

weapon, to wit: <insert description of weapon>, during

commission of the crime[s][in Count[s]].]

To prove this allegation, the People must prove that the defendant, while

committing the crime[s][in Count[s]], (knowingly carried a

weapon[,]/ [or]knowingly had a weapon available for use[,]/ [or

]intentionally displayed a weapon in a menacing manner[,]/ [or

]intentionally (fired/ [or]attempted to fire) a weapon[,]/ [or]intentionally

(struck[,]/ [or]stabbed[,]/ [or]slashed[,]/ [or]hit][,]/ [or]attempted to

(strike[,]/ [or]stab[,]/ [or]slash[,]/ [or]hit) another person with a

weapon).

[A device, instrument, or object that is capable of being used to inflict

injury or death may be a weapon. In determining whether

<insert description> was a weapon, you may consider the totality of

circumstances, including the manner in which it was used or possessed.]

Y ou may not find the allegation true unless all of you agree that the

People have proved that the defendant was either armed or used a

weapon. However, all of you do not need to agree on which act[s] or

conduct constitutes the arming or use of a weapon.

Y ou may not find the allegation true unless all of you agree that the

People have proved that the defendant’s conduct was distinctively worse

than an ordinary commission of the underlying crime.

[Y ou must decide whether the People have proved this allegation for

each crime and return a separate finding for each crime.]

The People have the burden of proving this allegation beyond a

reasonable doubt. If the People have not met this burden, you must find

that the allegation has not been proved.

New March 2023; Revised March 2024,* February 2025,* February 2026*

* Denotes changes only to bench notes and other commentaries.

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2026
Content hash
3bd4a791054379ad016e91d96eb0eaa78d4940b88eda6bc1c77123a6a1071b84
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.