CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 3200
Controlled Substance: Quantity (Pen. Code,
§§ 1203.07(a)(1), (2) & (4); Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11352.5, 11370.4)
If you find the defendant guilty of the crime[s] charged in Count[s]
[,] [or of attempting to commit (that/those) crime[s]][or the
lesser crime[s] of <insert lesser offense[s]>], you must then
decide whether[, for each crime,] the People have proved the additional
allegation that the crime involved [more than] a specified amount [or
more] of the controlled substance. [Y ou must decide whether the People
have proved this allegation for each crime and return a separate finding
for each crime.]
To prove this allegation, the People must prove that:
[1.] The defendant <insert conduct alleged, e.g., sold or
conspired to sell> [more than] <insert quantity
alleged> by (weight/volume) [or more] of a substance containing
<insert controlled substance>(./;)
<Give element 2 if enhancement alleged in conspiracy count.>
[AND
2. The defendant was substantially involved in the planning,
direction, execution, or financing of the <insert
conduct alleged, e.g., sale> of the <insert controlled
substance>.]
[In deciding whether the required (weight/volume) has been proved, do
not take into account plant or vegetable material.]
The People have the burden of proving each allegation beyond a
reasonable doubt. If the People have not met this burden, you must find
that the allegation has not been proved.
New January 2006
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2019
- Content hash
81a6a7e0950cf8815d63d12de7a772584f93fe11ed266f7f934466ccdb0cfcd5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.