Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 320

Exercise of Privilege by Witness

activein force · 2025-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

<Alternative A—V alid Exercise of Privilege>

[A witness may refuse to answer questions that call for privileged

information. Under the law, <insert name of witness> was

justified in refusing to answer certain questions. Do not consider (his/

her) refusal to answer for any reason at all and do not guess what (his/

her) answer would have been.]

<Alternative B—Invalid Exercise of Privilege>

[<insert name of witness> did not have the right to refuse to

answer questions in this case. Y ou may consider that refusal during your

deliberations.]

New January 2006; Revised August 2014, September 2024*

* Denotes changes only to bench notes and other commentaries.

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2025
Content hash
5447e3e444290a2a911a9f6d2c96dccdf2382c5ecc88f8f25f3d7e91fd411439
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.