Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 302

Evaluating Conflicting Evidence

activein force · 2019-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

If you determine there is a conflict in the evidence, you must decide what

evidence, if any, to believe. Do not simply count the number of witnesses

who agree or disagree on a point and accept the testimony of the greater

number of witnesses. On the other hand, do not disregard the testimony

of any witness without a reason or because of prejudice or a desire to

favor one side or the other. What is important is whether the testimony

or any other evidence convinces you, not just the number of witnesses

who testify about a certain point.

New January 2006; Revised June 2007

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2019
Content hash
04e5f210a92e263bf0a9f5bfbd20b452ff17dfd790a9aba6a2c669c630294122
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.