CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 2338
Possession of Isomers or Precursors With Intent to
Manufacture Controlled Substance (Health & Saf. Code,
§ 11383.5(c)–(f))
The defendant is charged [in Count] with possessing substances
with the intent to manufacture (methamphetamine [or
<insert analog of methamphetamine from Health & Saf. Code, § 11055(d)>]/
N-ethylamphetamine/phencyclidine (PCP) [or <insert analog
of PCP from Health & Saf. Code, § 11054(d) or § 11055(e)>]) [in violation
of Health and Safety Code section 11383.5].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
prove that:
1. The defendant possessed <insert name or description
of substance[s] from Health & Saf. Code, § 11383.5(c), (d), (e), or
(f)>;
AND
2. When the defendant possessed (that/those) substance[s], (he/she)
intended to use (it/them) to manufacture (methamphetamine [or
<insert analog of methamphetamine from Health &
Saf. Code, § 11055(d)>]/N-ethylamphetamine/phencyclidine (PCP)
[or <insert analog of PCP from Health & Saf. Code,
§ 11054(d) or § 11055(e)>]).
[Two or more people may possess something at the same time.]
[A person does not have to actually hold or touch something to possess
it. It is enough if the person has (control over it/ [or] the right to control
it), either personally or through another person.]
New January 2006; Revised June 2007
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2020
- Content hash
f7835a3708585bc963bda82ffa73951b54b7fc0ff5fd5f0cb7234f9f6a4587fa
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.