Bindinglaw

CA · jury_instructions

CALCRIM No. 1933

Possession of Counterfeiting Equipment (Pen. Code, § 480)

activein force · 2021-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

The defendant is charged [in Count] with making or possessing

counterfeiting equipment [in violation of Penal Code section 480].

To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must

prove that:

1. The defendant [made] [or] [possessed] (a/an) (die/ [or] plate/ [or]

apparatus/ [or] paper/ [or] metal/ [or] machine/ [or]

<insert other item>);

[2. The defendant knew of the equipment’s presence;]

AND

(2/3). The defendant knew that the (die/ [or] plate/ [or] apparatus/ [or]

paper/ [or] metal/ [or] machine/ [or] <insert other

item>) had been or would be used to counterfeit (coin/gold dust/

gold or silver (bars/bullion/lumps/pieces/nuggets)/bank notes or

bills).

[Two or more people may possess something at the same time.]

[A person does not have to actually hold or touch something to possess

it. It is enough if the person has (control over it/ [or] the right to control

it), either personally or through another person.]

[The People allege that the defendant possessed the following items:

<insert description of each item when multiple items alleged>.

Y ou may not find the defendant guilty unless you all agree that the

People have proved that the defendant possessed at least one of these

items and you all agree on which item (he/she) possessed.]

New March 2021

Provenance

Source
courts.ca.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
calcrim-2021
Content hash
c98829ed5b28ec0d3cca3a08b789e81c6a62e15b7b9b72823fdc8e18d74c9975
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.