CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 1806
Theft by Embezzlement (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 503)
The defendant is charged [in Count] with [grand/petty] theft by
embezzlement [in violation of Penal Code section 503].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
prove that:
1. An owner [or the owner’s agent] entrusted (his/her) property to
the defendant;
2. The owner [or owner’s agent] did so because (he/she) trusted the
defendant;
3. The defendant fraudulently (converted/used) that property for
(his/her) own benefit;
AND
4. When the defendant (converted/used) the property, (he/she)
intended to deprive the owner of (it/its use).
A person acts fraudulently when he or she takes undue advantage of
another person or causes a loss to that person by breaching a duty, trust
or confidence.
[A good faith belief in acting with authorization to use the property is a
defense.]
[In deciding whether the defendant believed that (he/she) had a right to
the property and whether (he/she) held that belief in good faith, consider
all the facts known to (him/her) at the time (he/she) obtained the
property, along with all the other evidence in the case. The defendant
may hold a belief in good faith even if the belief is mistaken or
unreasonable. But if the defendant was aware of facts that made that
belief completely unreasonable, you may conclude that the belief was not
held in good faith.]
[An intent to deprive the owner of property, even temporarily, is
enough.]
[Intent to restore the property to its owner is not a defense.]
[An agent is someone to whom the owner has given complete or partial
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2019
- Content hash
4bb2f55b9c06b8f38f7cd467bd3e9c22783fff656021d9fc9ddd28aa59383398
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.