CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 1802
Theft: As Part of Overall Plan
If you conclude that the defendant committed more than one theft, you
must then decide if the defendant committed grand theft. To prove that
the defendant is guilty of grand theft, the People must prove that:
1. The defendant committed multiple thefts of (property/ [(and/or)]
services);
2. The combined value of the (property/ [(and/or)] services) was
over $950;
2. AND
3. In obtaining the (property/ [(and/or)] services), the defendant was
motivated by one intention, one general impulse, and one plan.
If you conclude that, as to one or more alleged theft, the People have
failed to prove grand theft, the theft[s] you have found proven (is/are)
petty theft[s].
New January 2006; Revised February 2012, August 2015, August 2016, September
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2024
- Content hash
79400ecb68ef1a56f9bda0519835df412acd2292bb08b1621596edb148d64be1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.