CA · jury_instructions
CALCRIM No. 1000
Rape by Force, Fear, or Threats (Pen. Code, § 261(a)(2), (6)
& (7))
The defendant is charged [in Count] with rape by force [in
violation of Penal Code section 261(a)].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
prove that:
1. The defendant had sexual intercourse with another person;
2. The other person did not consent to the intercourse;
AND
3. The defendant accomplished the intercourse by
<Alternative 3A—force or fear>
[force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful
bodily injury to the person or to someone else.]
<Alternative 3B—future threats of bodily harm>
[threatening to retaliate in the future against the person or someone
else when there was a reasonable possibility that the defendant would
carry out the threat. A threat to retaliate is a threat to kidnap, falsely
imprison, or inflict extreme pain, serious bodily injury, or death.]
<Alternative 3C—threat of offıcial action>
[threatening to use the authority of a public office to incarcerate,
arrest, or deport someone. A public official is a person employed by
federal, state, or local government who has authority to incarcerate,
arrest, or deport. <insert name of alleged victim> must
have reasonably believed that the defendant was a public official even
if the defendant was not.]
Sexual intercourse means any penetration, no matter how slight, of the
vagina or genitalia by the penis. [Ejaculation is not required.]
[To consent, a person must know the nature of the act or transaction
involved, act freely and voluntarily, and positively cooperate by act or
attitude.]
[A person who initially consents to an act of intercourse may change
(his/her) mind during the act. If (he/she) does so, under the law, the act
of intercourse is then committed without (his/her) consent if:
1. (He/She) communicated through words or acts to the defendant
that (he/she) no longer consented to the act of intercourse;
2. A reasonable person would have understood that (his/her) words
or acts expressed (his/her) lack of consent;
AND
3. The defendant forcibly continued the act of intercourse despite
(his/her) objection.]
[It is not required that (he/she) physically resist or fight back in order to
communicate (his/her) lack of consent.]
[Evidence that the defendant and the other person (dated/were married/
had been married) is not enough by itself to constitute consent.]
[Evidence that the other person (requested/suggested/communicated) that
the defendant use a condom or other birth control device is not enough
by itself to constitute consent.]
[Intercourse is accomplished by force if a person uses enough physical
force to overcome the other person’s will.]
[Duress means a direct or implied threat of force, violence, danger, or
retribution that would cause a reasonable person to do [or submit to]
something that (he/she) would not do [or submit to] otherwise. When
deciding whether the act was accomplished by duress, consider all the
circumstances, including the other person’s age and relationship to the
defendant.]
[Retribution is a form of payback or revenge.]
[Menace means a threat, statement, or act showing an intent to injure
someone.]
[Intercourse is accomplished by fear if the other person is actually and
reasonably afraid [or is actually but unreasonably afraid and the
defendant knows of the other person’s fear and takes advantage of it].]
[The other person must be alive at the time of the sexual intercourse for
the crime of rape to occur.]
<Defense: Reasonable Belief in Consent>
[The defendant is not guilty of rape if he actually and reasonably
believed that the other person consented to the intercourse [and actually
and reasonably believed that (he/she) consented throughout the act of
intercourse]. The People have the burden of proving beyond a
reasonable doubt that the defendant did not actually and reasonably
CALCRIM No. 1000 SEX OFFENSES
believe that the other person consented. If the People have not met this
burden, you must find the defendant not guilty.]
New January 2006; Revised February 2013, February 2014, March 2022, February
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- calcrim-2026
- Content hash
c5d5f4d13f9cddc0ffd9b0659054a0aadff802f9f0a9a02728628a876c1db7b6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.