CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 908
Duty to Protect Passengers From Assault
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] was negligent in failing
to prevent an attack by another. To establish this claim, [name of
plaintiff] must prove both of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] knew or, by using the highest care,
should have known that a passenger was reasonably likely to
attack another passenger; and
2. That by using the highest care, [name of defendant] could have
prevented or reduced the harm from the attack.
New September 2003
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2023
- Content hash
fbe105ff3144539a1e07f2b870c0f10176cfaefe34198683bdb08e29fb92a674
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.