CA · jury_instructions
CACI No. 720
Motor Vehicle Owner Liability—Permissive Use of Vehicle
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he/she/ nonbinary pronoun] was harmed
and that [name of defendant] is responsible for the harm because [name of
defendant] gave [name of driver] permission to operate the vehicle. To
establish this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove all of the following:
1. That [name of driver] was negligent in operating the vehicle;
2. That [name of defendant] was an owner of the vehicle at the time
of the injury to [name of plaintiff]; and
3. That [name of defendant], by words or conduct, gave permission to
[name of driver] to use the vehicle.
In determining whether permission was given, you may consider the
relationship between the owner and the operator. [For example, if the
parties are related or the owner and the operator are employer and
employee, such a relationship may support a finding that there was
implied permission to use the vehicle.]
[If the vehicle owner has given a person permission to use the vehicle,
and that person authorizes a third person to operate the vehicle, the
third person may be considered to have used the vehicle with the
permission of the owner.]
New September 2003
Provenance
- Source
- courts.ca.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- caci-2025
- Content hash
d426e53c9620c0ca719cbfa900e68102d973141e7f46548e84981760f4d5ec43
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.